"You Want To Demoralise Forces?" Supreme Court Raps Pahalgam Petitioner

The Supreme Court on Thursday slapped down a plea for a judicial probe into the Pahalgam terror attack and made sharp observations as it did so, including asking if the petitioner's intention was to "demoralise the forces" as they prep for a possible military response.

The court also asked why the judiciary should oversee a probe into matters related to anti-terrorism, asking, "Since when did Supreme Court judges become experts in these matters?"

"Be responsible before filing such PILs (public interest litigation). You have a duty towards the country also," an annoyed Justice Surya Kant said as the plea was mentioned, "Is this the way you want to demoralize our forces? Since when did we get expertise for this investigation?"

In reply the petitioner urged the court to consider the plea, stating it had been made on behalf of Kashmiri students in other states who may be targeted, either by terrorists or thugs looking for 'revenge' against the killing of 26 people, mostly civilians, in Pahalgam in the April 22 attack.

That plea follows concern by the Jammu and Kashmir government on this topic; Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, days after the attack, had deputed J&K ministers to coordinate with counterparts in other states to ensure the safety of Kashmiri students and residents living there.

The court, however, was disinclined to take up this plea, pointing out the PIL does not actually mention students at all. "This is not the time. This is the crucial hour when each citizen has joined hands... this is not acceptable to us. Look at sensitivity of the issue..."

"For prayer regarding students, you can go to the high courts," Justice NK Singh said.

The petitioner was eventually allowed to withdraw the plea and given the liberty to approach the High Court with respect to students' safety, although the government, represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, opposed this move. "Let this not go to the High Court," he said.

Trending News