SC Verdict on Illegal Migrants

The Supreme Court’s observation that “India is not a Dharamshala”-in reference to accommodating foreign nationals-marks a critical moment in India’s struggle with illegal immigration. The remark came in the context of a Sri Lankan citizen, a former LTTE member, challenging a Madras High Court order directing his deportation after serving a seven-year sentence under the UAPA. This verdict underscores the long-overdue necessity of treating the issue of illegal foreigners with the seriousness it warrants, particularly in light of the profound socio-economic and national security challenges they pose.
These individuals, often entering India through porous borders or overstaying their visas, do not just present an administrative burden-they increasingly contribute to various illegal and organized criminal activities. Across the country, there are credible reports linking illegal immigrants to human trafficking, narcotics smuggling, prostitution rackets, theft, and other organized crimes. Many operate under the radar, forming informal networks that are hard to dismantle due to their clandestine nature and occasional support from local sympathizers or politically motivated groups. Human trafficking is among the gravest concerns. Women and children are often the worst victims, with many being trafficked for bonded labour or pushed into the sex trade. Cities like Delhi, Kolkata, Mumbai, and even smaller towns have witnessed the rise of trafficking rackets linked to illegal immigrants, particularly from Bangladesh, Myanmar, and some African countries.
Narcotics smuggling is another key area. Border areas, especially those adjacent to Myanmar and Bangladesh, have seen surges in drug-related arrests. Rohingya networks in some regions are reportedly involved in drug peddling, with contraband routed through established smuggling corridors. Flesh trade and organized begging rackets-often involving minors-have also seen a rise, again with links to undocumented migrants. These activities not only exploit the vulnerable but deeply affect local law and order, burdening police and judicial systems.
The demographic shifts caused by illegal settlement alter the socio-political balance in sensitive regions, fueling tensions and resentment among locals. States like Assam, West Bengal, and parts of Jammu & Kashmir are vivid examples. In the Jammu Division, for instance, thousands of Rohingyas are settled in densely populated clusters, some alarmingly close to vital army installations. Their presence is not just a demographic issue but a serious threat to national security. Security agencies have repeatedly flagged concerns over the risk of radicalization and the possibility of sleeper cells among such migrant communities. Reports suggest some of these migrants have been detained under suspicion of involvement in anti-national activities, with others found in possession of forged identity documents-indicating their integration into criminal networks. Worse still, many of these individuals are lodged in detention centres, being fed and housed at taxpayers’ expense. With India already facing a resource crunch, especially in healthcare, education, and food security, sustaining illegal foreigners becomes an unsustainable and unjust burden on the citizenry.
The Supreme Court’s ruling reaffirms that the right to reside and settle in India is a constitutional privilege extended only to its citizens. Article 21, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, cannot be stretched to protect illegal migrants seeking to exploit India’s democratic and humanitarian values. The apex court’s reminder that identity cards issued by international bodies such as the UNHCR do not override Indian law is crucial. Indian sovereignty, law, and national interest must prevail. This ruling provides a legal and moral foundation for policymakers to take bolder steps against illegal immigration. It is important that the Indian Government strengthens border controls, accelerates the detection and deportation process, and ensures biometric and digital tracking of all foreign entrants. Special attention must be given to regions like Jammu & Kashmir, where demographic manipulation could have dangerous long-term consequences. The Supreme Court’s forthrightness in this matter must serve as a catalyst for a comprehensive national policy on illegal immigration. India’s hospitality cannot be mistaken for vulnerability. The country has a right, and a duty, to protect its borders, its people, and its future.

The post SC Verdict on Illegal Migrants appeared first on Daily Excelsior.

News