OPINION | Gifting Trouble: When Generosity Ends Up In Courtrooms
In the realm of Indian jurisprudence, few things are as generous as a gift deed, and fewer still as regretful.
The Supreme Court in NP Saseendran v. NP Ponnamma recently found itself doing what courts do best: cleaning up after the emotional wreckage of a well-intended gesture gone legally rogue. At the heart of the matter was a gift deed, that noble instrument of transfer, which the donor later wished to unsign, unmake, and undo.
Spoiler alert: law doesn’t work like WhatsApp. You can't "delete for everyone" once the deed is done.
Of Gifts and Grudges
The facts? Classic family drama. A person presumably in good faith (or maybe just good old-fashioned pressure), executes a gift deed in favour of her daughter. Years later, the same person tries to revoke it, claiming — among other things — lack of intention, misunderstanding, and perhaps divine regret.
But the Supreme Court was clear: a registered gift deed, duly executed and accepted, is no child’s play. It is legally binding. You cannot cancel it unilaterally unless there's proven fraud, coercion, or undue influence — and even then, not casually.
The Court’s Tone: Law Over Sentiment
The judgment walks the fine line between compassion and cold legality. It acknowledges the emotional layers of familial transactions but insists that legal solemnity cannot be sacrificed at the altar of afterthought.
In a telling paragraph, the Bench reminded us that the law doesn’t view “gift” as a whim — it views it as an actum voluntarium, a voluntary and complete act. Much like karma, it cannot be undone with a mere "I didn’t mean it."
Justice Delayed, and How!
Now, let’s talk about the elephant in the courtroom — the delay. This wasn’t just a case of judicial patience. It was a marathon that outlived many family milestones. The deed was executed decades ago, and litigation bloomed like a never-ending soap opera, only with more footnotes and fewer ad breaks.
The Supreme Court, in subtle but pointed tones, expressed its weariness at how a simple family settlement ballooned into a multi-decade legal saga. The message was implicit: India’s overburdened judiciary can ill afford to be the referee in endless domestic Cold Wars.
What’s the Takeaway?
- A gift deed is not a greeting card. It has legal teeth.
- Cancellation isn’t a DIY affair. You need valid legal grounds and due process.
- If you’re gifting immovable property, pause, reflect, and draft carefully — with both heart and head.
- And lastly, settle at home if you can. If you choose court, carry a thermos — you’ll be there a while.
When Emotion Meets Law
NP Saseendran v. NP Ponnamma is a case study in what happens when familial affection turns into legal affliction. It’s a cautionary tale for those who think that legal instruments are reversible love letters. They are not.
As the Supreme Court closed the case file, one imagines the justices sighing — not just at the legal missteps, but at the decades of lost peace, festering grudges, and calendar dates sacrificed at the altar of litigation.
Because in the end, the true cost wasn’t property. It was time.
Raj Kumar Varier is an independent legal advisor and former legal head with Airtel, Samsung, Disney Star, DEN, and ABP. He advises on real estate, media, technology, and policy matters across India, and is a trusted partner for legal, regulatory, and forensic matters.
Disclaimer: The opinions, beliefs, and views expressed by the various authors and forum participants on this website are personal and do not reflect the opinions, beliefs, and views of ABP Network Pvt. Ltd.
business