The Ceasefire: A Strategic Retreat?
BY B.S.DARA
In the grey haze of May 2025, war broke out first in ticker tapes and touchscreen war rooms, then not in trenches. India rolled out Operation Sindoor and Pakistan countered with Operation Bunyan al-Marsoos. But what followed wasn’t war in the classical sense, it was theatre. Four days of aerial muscle-flexing, scattered missiles, and scrambled jets spiralled into something far more surreal: a high-definition shadow play where AI-generated dogfights looped endlessly across news cycles, and studio pundits screamed louder than any cockpit warning alarm.
The conflict was ignited by a terrorist attack on April 22, 2025, in Pahalgam, Kashmir, which resulted in the deaths of 26 civilians. India attributed the attack to Pakistan-based militants, leading to the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty and the closure of border crossings. In response, Pakistan denied involvement and vowed retaliation. Analysts have suggested that the Modi government’s decision to launch military strikes was influenced by domestic political considerations, aiming to bolster national security credentials amid growing public discontent over the Pahalgam massacre.
On May 7, India launched Operation Sindoor, a 23-minute missile strike targeting nine locations across Pakistan and Pakistani-occupied Kashmir. The Indian Air Force deployed Rafale jets armed with SCALP cruise missiles and Hammer bombs. While India claimed to have destroyed terrorist infrastructure, reports indicated that at least 15 civilians were killed, and 43 injured, raising questions about the operation’s precision and adherence to international humanitarian standards.
The Indian government’s portrayal of the operation as a decisive blow against terrorism was met with scepticism by international defence analysts. French military officials noted that the loss of a Rafale jet to a Chinese-made Chengdu J-10 fighter underscored vulnerabilities in India’s air capabilities. This marked the first time a Rafale had been downed in combat, challenging the narrative of technological superiority.
Pakistan’s response came on May 10 with Operation Bunyan al-Marsoos, an offensive that included drone strikes and missile attacks on Indian cities, including the capital, New Delhi. Pakistan claimed to have downed five Indian aircraft, including two Rafales, using Chinese-made JF-17 Thunder jets and PL-15 missiles. The scale of the aerial engagement, involving over 100 fighter jets, was described as one of the largest since World War II.
The conflict’s intensity and the involvement of advanced Chinese weaponry highlighted the shifting dynamics of regional power. China’s support for Pakistan not only altered the military balance but also signalled a strategic alignment that complicated India’s position. This development forced Indian defence analysts to reconsider their approach to future conflicts, emphasizing the need for technological advancements and strategic alliances.
The media played a pivotal role in shaping public perception of the conflict. AI-generated visuals and sensationalist reporting often exaggerated the scale of the battles, creating a narrative of overwhelming victories and technological prowess. However, the reality on the ground was more nuanced. Both nations suffered casualties, and the civilian toll underscored the human cost of the conflict. The rapid escalation and equally swift ceasefire raised questions about the strategic objectives and the decision-making processes behind the military actions.
The abrupt ceasefire announced by the Indian government, just days after launching Operation Sindoor, has met with criticism. Défense analysts noted that a party with the upper hand in a conflict rarely agrees to a ceasefire without achieving its objectives. This was evident in historical precedents, such as India’s decisive victory in the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s leadership. The Modi government’s hasty cessation of hostilities contrasted sharply with this legacy, leading to perceptions of indecisiveness and lack of strategic foresight.
The public’s reaction further fuelled the debate. Many Indians, recalling the assertive leadership of Indira Gandhi, questioned the current government’s handling of the crisis. The rapid escalation and equally swift de-escalation were seen as indicative of a lack of preparedness and control over the situation.
The lessons learned would serve as a stark reminder that modern warfare is not won through rhetoric alone. While political narratives can galvanize public support, they cannot substitute for strategic planning, technological superiority, and military preparedness. India’s experience highlighted the need for investment in advanced defence systems, enhanced training, and the cultivation of strategic alliances to counter evolving threats.
The involvement of Chinese-made aircraft and missiles in Pakistan’s arsenal underscored the importance of staying abreast of regional military developments. India’s defence strategy must adapt to the changing landscape, focusing on technological innovation and diplomatic engagement to maintain a credible deterrent.
The brief but intense conflict between India and Pakistan has revealed the complexities of modern warfare. It has highlighted the gap between media portrayals and ground realities, the limitations of technological superiority, and the risks of political decisions driven by domestic considerations.
******
The post The Ceasefire: A Strategic Retreat? appeared first on Daily Excelsior.
News